🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have harvested a vast number of tracks from the popular streaming service and is preparing to release them publicly.

Possible Impetus for AI Development

Industry experts noted the apparent leak could aid AI companies searching for data to train their technology.

A group known as Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from Spotify and 256 million rows of associated data such as performer and record names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, stated that the breach did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have located and disabled the nefarious user accounts that engaged in unlawful scraping,” stated a Spotify representative.

The Stockholm-based company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an investigation into unauthorised access identified a third party scraped public metadata and employed illicit methods to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Goal and Concerns

The streaming service does not believe the audio acquired by Anna’s Archive has been released yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to pirated books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a method of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” commented Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s information and culture”.

AI Training and Copyright Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ rights, remarked the leaked music would likely be used for developing artificial intelligence systems.

“Training on illegally sourced data is sadly widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is highly likely to be used instructing AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to LibGen, a huge online repository of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by Meta to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on LinkedIn that individuals of the public could in principle “create their own personal free equivalent of the service”. He said it could also allow tech companies to “educate models on contemporary music at scale”.

Copyright has become a battleground between creatives, authors and creatives on one side and tech giants on the other.

Policy Proposals and Responses

Across Britain, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government suggestion to let AI companies use protected work without permission unless the rights holder opts out. Virtually every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, research and development informed parliament this month there was “no clear consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “take the time to get this right”. The government has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by next year.